If a system saves drafting time but increases correction time, its value changes. Honest calculation includes review, errors, setup and maintenance.
The decision to examine
Compare the same task at the same quality. Include staff time, review and incidents, and separate setup from operation. Do not attribute hypothetical savings to the organisation.
Worked example
Example: usual drafting takes 30 minutes; assistance 12 and review 10. Total is 22, saving 8 minutes or about 26.7%. A serious remaining error still prevents adoption.
From idea to practice
- Describe the problem as a need, not a product name.
- Specify evidence needed before a decision and who reviews it.
- Test a non-personal example and log failures as well as successes.
- State whether to continue, improve or stop and why.
Your exercise
Recalculate with 25 minutes of review and write a decision that accounts for quality.
Review rubric
A useful answer identifies a context, checkable evidence, a boundary and an owner for the next step. If it fits any organisation unchanged, add a detail specific to the case. This is a learning rubric, not automatic marking or official assessment.
Further reading: AI Risk Management Framework — NIST · 2023; page reviewed 2026 · Checked: 8 October 2026
Your next step
Open the readiness notebook · Explore policy sources
Institutional DJAIRI material prepared with AI assistance. Learning examples are hypothetical; analysis and recommendations are Mustanef’s. Citing a source does not imply partnership or endorsement.