A discussion session you can run now: which decisions should remain human? This is not a new comments platform or a promised event.
Scenario
A hypothetical association proposes tool-assisted service triage. Its team discusses convenience, appeal and exclusion of people without connectivity. The exercise uses no real applicant names or requests.
- Assign roles: user, officer, reviewer and service owner.
- Each names a possible benefit, risk and required evidence.
- Compare the manual alternative with a bounded trial.
- Write the decision, unknowns and follow-up owner without inventing consensus.
Use the case workshop · Send a contribution or question
Conversations
A question for conversation: what should remain a human decision?
An open invitation to discuss delegation to tools: who decides, who explains the decision and who takes responsibility for its effects?
Read the piece: A question for conversation: what should remain a human decision?