An original policy brief translating discussion into a bounded, accountable decision. It does not assume identical laws or already achieved outcomes.
Executive summary
Start with a need described by its users, then compare a non-technical alternative.
Problem and decision options
A general principle is not enough. Compare the current method, an improved existing process and a bounded technical trial. Each has resource, risk and accountability implications; not using AI may be the best decision.
Recommendation 1
Start with a need described by its users, then compare a non-technical alternative.
Proposed action: name an owner, define a document or example proving delivery, and set a review point before expansion. The authorised body in your context must approve the decision; writing a plan is not proof of completion.
Recommendation 2
Budget review, maintenance and error logging, not just development.
Proposed action: name an owner, define a document or example proving delivery, and set a review point before expansion. The authorised body in your context must approve the decision; writing a plan is not proof of completion.
Recommendation 3
Do not scale without evidence of quality, access and stopping capability.
Proposed action: name an owner, define a document or example proving delivery, and set a review point before expansion. The authorised body in your context must approve the decision; writing a plan is not proof of completion.
Usable implementation template
| Action | Owner | Evidence | Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Start with a need described by its users, then compare a non-technical alternative. | Assign locally | Checkable example or document | Before expansion |
| Budget review, maintenance and error logging, not just development. | Assign locally | Checkable example or document | Before expansion |
| Do not scale without evidence of quality, access and stopping capability. | Assign locally | Checkable example or document | Before expansion |
Example and measurement
In a hypothetical organisation, a small team reviews ten non-personal cases, counting processing and correction time and serious errors. Delivery means an evidence log, owner and correction route. Improved outcomes require an appropriate comparison, not attendance counts or purchase alone.
Risks and limits
Laws, resources and circumstances vary. Consult local sources and qualified specialists before decisions affecting rights or public funds. If authority or essential evidence is missing, do not invent an estimate: choose verification or a narrower trial.
Further reading: AI Risk Management Framework — NIST · 2023; page reviewed 2026 · Checked: 8 October 2026
Your next step
Open the readiness notebook · Explore policy sources
Institutional DJAIRI material prepared with AI assistance. Learning examples are hypothetical; analysis and recommendations are Mustanef’s. Citing a source does not imply partnership or endorsement.